Posts Tagged ‘Regulation’

Regulation in television – Blog 30/01/2014, Robert Gray

February 10, 2014

Regulation in television

 

Watershed -> Adults past 9pm

More explicit adult material tends to be shows later around 10:30. However it is still allowed after the watershed.

The parental lock that some service providers use works as a watershed.

At the start of some programs and in the guide, offers consumer advice on programs.

This is also the case for advertising.

OFCOM – The independent regulator. (state regulator)

Specification of broadcast code.

Provides mandatory broadcast rules.

This covers :

  • Protection of under 18’s  (The law)
  • Harm and offence (no obscene)
  • Crime (glorification)
  • Religion (Blasphemy)
  • Sponsorship (limit what can be shown )
  • Elections (Has to be impartial)
  • Privacy (faces blurred & schools children’s feet shown)

Remember : All TV companies need a licence to broadcast.

PSB

For wider information see pages 44-53, Required.

Educate, inform as well as entertain.

BBC – Act as a cultural (e.g. Glastonbury ) moral (crime watch) and educative force.

ITV – They also have so PSB requirements however remember a commercial channels aim is maximise revenues and profits.

Channel 4 – Was set up to cater for minorities.

Their legal duty to:

  1. Educate, inform as well as entertain.
  2. Appeal to tastes not catered for by ITV.
  3. Encourage diversity and originality.

Channel 4 is no longer like it was but still does cater for minorities e.g. “The undateables”

Arguments for PSB:

  • BBC is able to put on niche programs, due to the licence fee otherwise certain programs would disappear e.g. The opera
  • Quality rather than ratings
  • Maintain principle of enlightened democracy
  • Continue the idea of a shared experience

Arguments against PSB:

  • Out dated
  • Irrelevant
  • Elitist
  • Restricts competition which could bring increased choice and ‘quality’

OFCOM

This offers:

  1. Protection for harmful exposure (remember – the effects debate)
  2. Infringement of privacy
  3. Unfair treatment
  4. People can complain – the right to defend themselves.

They can :

  • Direct a broadcaster not to repeat programs and advertisements
  • Direct to publish a correction
  • It can fine, shorten or revoke.

Ofcom have a compliance officer (lawyers)

The most recent code of broadcasting is from 2009.

It also operates taking this into account:

The human rights act à We have a right to know.

The BBC is regulated by Ofcom however it is also regulated by the BBC trust.

Relevant information

Key word: Adjunctions

Majestic TV – fined for breaking code (£12,500) – the debate, is this enough?

 

Advertisements

Film Regulation

February 10, 2014

Key trend over time- Liberalisation and rationalisation

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Moralistic paternalism          ————————>          Bureaucratic protectionism

Unwritten rules                                                                                      Published guidelines

Shared values                                                                                          Public consultation

Rigid moral code                                                                                   Child protection

“We know what’s best for you”

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BBFC (British Board of Film Censorship) was set up to avoid government censorship of the film industry.

If the industry regulates itself, then it controls regulation.

BBFC established ———> Prohibits “indecorous, ambiguous and irreverent titles”                                          Introduction of  “U”, “A” and “H” symbols

|                                                        as well as “unnecessary exhibition of under-clothing” , ect.                              |

|                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

1912 ———————————-1920’s———————————————————————–1930’s—————————————1940’s

Pre-war Victorian values                                                                                                                                                     Inter-war years: General strike, Depression and decline of the Empire

In the USA- Production code

“Law of compensating values”- Bad guys must be punished
An example of the strictness of regulation at the time is the 1953 film “The Wild One”. The film was banned for 14 years by the BBFC, until being given an “X” rating in 1967.

You can watch an excerpt of the film here-

By today’s standards the idea this film could be banned is laughable considering how tame it is in our modern context. However the main character portrayed by Marlon Brando acts in a way which at the time would have been unacceptable, yet still walks away at the end- which in accordance with the “law of compensating values”, is unacceptable.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Censorship changes

1951- “X” category introduced—————–> “The Wild One” release delayed for 14 years for                                              “X” raised to 18

|                                                                                                “spectacle of unbridled hooliganism”                                                               |

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |

1950’s——————————————————-1960’s——————————————————————–1970’s

Post-war prosperity                                               Baby-boomers come of age               Lady Chatterley’s                   The dream sours,

and birth of the teenager                                     “sexual and social liberation”             lover trial                                  economic unrest

BBFC becomes “British Board of Film Classification

Guidelines for consumers

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1984 Video Recordings Act

-Videos were not required to be certified

-“Video nasties” caused tabloid moral panic (e.g. “Driller Killer” and “The Evil Dead”)

1990’s- very rare for films to be cut (as it is for today)

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BBFC vision statement-

http://issuu.com/citycollegemedia/docs/vision_statement_1_/1

Heavily entrenched in the effects debate- which has no evidence to support it.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

70’s- Change over between moralistic paternalism and Bureaucratic protectionism. BBFC were behind the times, most censored decade, 26.7% of films cut, 3.2% banned outright.

Legal Framework

-Video recordings act 1984-Requires BBFC to have special regard for any harm to those likely to view a video

-Cinematograph films (animals) act 1937- Illegal to show any cruelty to animals

-Protection of children act 1978- Illegal to show indecent photographs of anyone under 18

-Obscene publications act 1959- Illegal to show a work that is obscene with tendency to “deprave and corrupt” a significant portion of the audience.

At 18 rating, they try to allow everything with exception to that which is illegal, e.g. sexual abuse of Michelle in “Ill Manors” is allowed because it is condemned by the film, if it were portrayed positively, the film would be banned.